Côte d'Ivoire vs Jordan: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Jordan
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 8,177 against 8,068 in Jordan, a difference of 109.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jordan ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 60th and Jordan ranks 62nd of 179 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,614 | 7,353 | 5,739 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 430.6 | 24,133 | 23,703 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 19,392 | 36,942 | 17,550 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, Côte d'Ivoire or Jordan?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 8,177 against 8,068 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum between Côte d'Ivoire and Jordan?
- 109, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Jordan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Jordan rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 60th and Jordan ranks 62nd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.