China vs Republic of Moldova: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum over time
- China
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 594 against 482 in China, a difference of 112.
That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.2 times China's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
China ranks 111th and Republic of Moldova ranks 108th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.9 | 101.3 | 67.4 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 445.7 | 77.8 | 367.9 | China |
| 2020s | 674.5 | 964.83 | 290.33 | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, China or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 594 against 482 in China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum between China and Republic of Moldova?
- 112, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Republic of Moldova?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do China and Republic of Moldova rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum?
- China ranks 111th and Republic of Moldova ranks 108th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.