Belarus vs Namibia: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum over time
- Belarus
- Namibia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1,470 against 1,326 in Namibia, a difference of 144.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Belarus ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 96th of 179 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 170.2 | 1,379 | 1,209 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 159.1 | 1,347 | 1,188 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 665.83 | 2,016 | 1,350 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, Belarus or Namibia?
- Belarus, at 1,470 against 1,326 in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum between Belarus and Namibia?
- 144, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Namibia rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum?
- Belarus ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 96th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.