Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Malaysia: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per square kilometre

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.0215 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0.1478 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
34th
Malaysia rank
34th

Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per square kilometre over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Malaysia
00.050.10.150.2200020112023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.1478 units per square kilometre against 0.0215 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.1263 units per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 6.9 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 34th and Malaysia ranks 34th of 45 groups.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Malaysia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0037 units per square kilometre 0.0206 units per square kilometre 0.0169 units per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 0.0073 units per square kilometre 0.1171 units per square kilometre 0.1098 units per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 0.0147 units per square kilometre 0.1485 units per square kilometre 0.1338 units per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 0.1478 units per square kilometre against 0.0215 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Malaysia?
0.1263 units per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Malaysia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Malaysia rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per square kilometre?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 34th and Malaysia ranks 34th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Malaysia: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/asylum-seekers-by-country-or-territory-of-asylum-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/asylum-seekers-by-country-or-territory-of-asylum-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/malaysia/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Malaysia: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 4,911 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.