China vs Timor-Leste: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per capita
China
0 units per person
in 2025
Timor-Leste
0 units per person
in 2015
China rank
156th
Timor-Leste rank
158th
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per capita over time
- China
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
China currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
China ranks 156th and Timor-Leste ranks 158th of 179 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per capita, China or Timor-Leste?
- China, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Timor-Leste as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per capita between China and Timor-Leste?
- 0 units per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Timor-Leste?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
- How do China and Timor-Leste rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per capita?
- China ranks 156th and Timor-Leste ranks 158th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.