Aruba vs Hong Kong, China: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per capita
Aruba
0 units per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
0 units per person
in 2025
Aruba rank
158th
Hong Kong, China rank
158th
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per capita over time
- Aruba
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Aruba ranks 158th and Hong Kong, China ranks 158th of 179 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0011 units per person | 0.0001 units per person | 0.001 units per person | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per capita, Aruba or Hong Kong, China?
- Aruba, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per capita between Aruba and Hong Kong, China?
- 0 units per person, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Hong Kong, China?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Hong Kong, China rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per capita?
- Aruba ranks 158th and Hong Kong, China ranks 158th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.