Mus vs Sri Lanka: Alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue
Mus
6.7%
in 2013
Sri Lanka
5.5%
in 2013
Mus rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
2nd
Alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue over time
- Mus
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mus currently reports 6.7% against 5.5% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.2%.
That makes Mus's figure about 1.2 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mus ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 2nd of 1 regions.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mus averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mus | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5% | 4.1% | 1.6% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 6.0% | 5.4% | 0.5% | Mus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue, Mus or Sri Lanka?
- Mus, at 6.7% against 5.5% in Sri Lanka as of 2013.
- What is the difference in alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue between Mus and Sri Lanka?
- 1.2%, with Mus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Mus and Sri Lanka rank globally for alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue?
- Mus ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 2nd of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.