Finland vs Mus: Alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue
Finland
4.6%
in 2015
Mus
6.7%
in 2013
Finland rank
3rd
Mus rank
1st
Alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue over time
- Finland
- Mus
How they compare
Mus currently reports 6.7% against 4.6% in Finland, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Mus's figure about 1.5 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 3rd and Mus ranks 1st of 26 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Mus in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Mus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.3% | 2.5% | 2.8% | Finland |
| 2010s | 5.0% | 6.0% | 0.9% | Mus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue, Finland or Mus?
- Mus, at 6.7% against 4.6% in Finland as of 2013.
- What is the difference in alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue between Finland and Mus?
- 2.1%, with Mus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mus?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Finland and Mus rank globally for alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue?
- Finland ranks 3rd and Mus ranks 1st of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.