Guyana vs Iceland: Academic Freedom Index

Guyana
0.761
in 2025
Iceland
0.756
in 2025
Guyana rank
61st
Iceland rank
64th

Academic Freedom Index over time

  • Guyana
  • Iceland
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 0.761 against 0.756 in Iceland, a difference of 0.005.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Guyana ahead.

Guyana ranks 61st and Iceland ranks 64th of 174 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7033 0.648 0.0553 Guyana
1970s 0.6595 0.819 0.1595 Iceland
1980s 0.677 0.85 0.173 Iceland
1990s 0.7407 0.915 0.1743 Iceland
2000s 0.7338 0.912 0.1782 Iceland
2010s 0.7421 0.9131 0.171 Iceland
2020s 0.7725 0.8677 0.0952 Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher academic freedom index, Guyana or Iceland?
Guyana, at 0.761 against 0.756 in Iceland as of 2025.
What is the difference in academic freedom index between Guyana and Iceland?
0.005, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
How do Guyana and Iceland rank globally for academic freedom index?
Guyana ranks 61st and Iceland ranks 64th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Academic Freedom Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Academic Freedom Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
174 places, 16,942 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which academics can research, teach, publish, express opinions, and participate in academic bodies without interference, censorship, or institutional restrictions, and universities exercise institutional autonomy.